Spark Movement Girls Protest – Ask TEEN Vogue To Ditch The Photoshop… Editors Get Alittle Nasty

By Lisa Pool Content Manager | July 12, 2012 at 9:20 pm | No comments | Culture, Fashion, Latest News | Tags: body image, couture fashion, curvy girl, entertaining, fashion, Huffington Post, jezebel, QGWD, Queen Grace, Queen Grace designer fashions, Spark Movement, Teen Vogue, Teens Picket Teen Vogue, Teens Protest Photoshop, Weekly Dish

Witty and often times a bit snarky, culture club pub Jezebel puts out the word on the socially charged teens and their campaign to ban Photoshop treatment of models in teen magazines. Here’s the dish;

After 14-year-old Julia Bluhm delivered 25,000 signatures on a petition to ban Photoshop from Seventeen magazine, the editors promised not to alter girls’ faces or bodies, but didn’t outright agree to stop Photoshopping its models and celebrity subjects — and they did not commit to publishing any unretouched photo spreads.

Still, 17-year-old Emma Stydahar and 16-year-old Carina Cruz — like Julie, members of the Spark Movement — staged a protest outside of the Teen Vogue offices yesterday, in which they held a mock runway show, in an effort to give the editors — and the world — an idea of what real girls look like.

Emma and Carina were allowed to meet with Teen Vogue editors, and the experience was not what they expected. Emma tells us:

We walked in, there was no handshake, no my name is, none of that. Just you sit here, you sit here. So you wanted this meeting — what do you want to say. We said what is in our petition… They proceeded to take out handfuls of magazines with little Post-It notes in them, [marking] what they perceived to be diverse images.

Most of them were thin African-American models. It was a good start — we love seeing women of color in these magazines. But two or three an issue — and all of them super stick skinny — isn’t what we’re looking for.

Emma says that the meeting was basically the editors telling the teenagers “we hadn’t done our homework, and that Teen Vogue is a great magazine, being unfairly accused.”

(It should be noted that when Julie Bluhm met with editors at Seventeen, there were cupcakes and a tour of the office. But Teen Vogue’s published by a company often called Condé Nasty.)

The truth is, what Emma and Carina are asking for goes beyond banning Photoshop. They want a wider variety of faces, disclosure if a pimple is removed, a magazine they can relate to. As it states in their petition:

It’s time for an end to the digitally enhanced, unrealistic “beauty” we see in the pages of magazines. We are demanding that teen magazines stop altering natural bodies and faces so that real girls can be the new standard of beauty.

Well now… we think this is fabulous and incredibly courageous of these newbie crusaders, but do we think this is the approach to get the results they’re looking for? Readers claim asking for all images to “real” industry wide is a far leap in faith (QG mean, really, this is the fashion industry people) but what to you think? Is this going to push even the nastiest of editors to pay attention? Comment and let us know where you stand!